https://internationalpublisher.id/journal/index.php/Lejea <p>Lead Journal of Economy and Administration is a periodical scientific journal published based on scientific journal principles aimed at publishing scientific works resulting from research, development and literature studies in the field of economy and administration. Published in May, August, November and February every year. Manuscripts are sent anytime via online (Registration). Lead Journal of Economy and Administration is published by "International Publisher - YAPENBI" which is one of the divisions under the auspices of the "Indonesian Sustainable Education Development Foundation (YAPENBI)".</p> <p>Average article action:<br /><strong>1-2 Days for First Editorial Decision<br />3-15 Days for Review Process</strong><br /><strong>16-30 Days for acceptance</strong><br /><strong>15% Turnitin Maximum</strong></p> <p>ISSN Number : 2961-8177</p> International Publisher en-US Lead Journal of Economy and Administration 2961-8177 https://internationalpublisher.id/journal/index.php/Lejea/article/view/453 <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The cancellation of unused trade marks is a key instrument within the trade mark legal system for preventing the hoarding of trade marks and safeguarding the function of trade marks as active commercial identities in trade. Although Pasal 74 UU No. 20 Tahun 2016 on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications sets out the mechanism for cancelling trade marks on the grounds of non-use, this provision does not provide clear parameters regarding the standard of use required for a trade mark to be legally maintained. Consequently, there is inconsistency in interpretation within judicial practice, as reflected in the differing legal reasoning between the Decision of the Central Jakarta Commercial Court No. 45/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst and the Decision of the Supreme Court No. 76 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024. This study analyses the mechanisms for the cancellation of unused trade marks in Indonesia in comparison with those in the United States and China, and formulates a legal reconstruction to achieve legal certainty using normative legal methods and legislative, case-law, conceptual and comparative legal approaches. The research findings indicate that the lack of clarity regarding the concept of ‘genuine use’ in Indonesian trade mark law leads to legal uncertainty in the assessment of trade mark use. The United States has developed a more measurable standard of ‘use in commerce’ through the ‘Affidavit of Use’ mechanism, whilst China has implemented an efficient administrative cancellation system through the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). Based on Gustav Radbruch’s theory of legal certainty, this study recommends the revision of Pasal 74 UU No. 20 Tahun 2016 Trade Marks and Geographical Indications Act by regulating the parameters of ‘genuine use’ and implementing a mechanism for the periodic reporting of trade mark use, with a view to enhancing legal certainty, procedural efficiency and the effectiveness of trade mark protection in Indonesia.</span></p> Sofyan Sauri Suherman Suherman Iwan Erar Joesoef Copyright (c) 2026 Lead Journal of Economy and Administration 2026-06-28 2026-06-28 4 3 102 108 10.56403/lejea.v4i3.453 https://internationalpublisher.id/journal/index.php/Lejea/article/view/454 <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This study aims to explore the effects of Biodiversity Accounting Disclosure (BAD), Climate Governance (CG), and Environmental Risk Management (ERM) on corporate reputation among mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2023–2025 period. Using a quantitative approach, the study draws on secondary data from annual reports and sustainability reports. The sample consists of 25 companies selected via purposive sampling, yielding 75 observations. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results indicate that the level of biodiversity disclosure and the practice of environmental risk management have a positive and significant relationship with corporate reputation. In contrast, climate governance does not exhibit a significant effect. Collectively, the three independent variables significantly explain variation in corporate reputation, with an Adjusted R² of 30.3%. These findings underscore the importance of transparency in biodiversity reporting and the effectiveness of environmental risk management in strengthening corporate image.</span></p> Maria Yovita R. Pandin Gita Lidyawati Safitri Alif Fa'is Nurfadila Anora Rajwa Erbana Maretha Wiriaqni Utama Nanda Nanda Najwa Bioarti Copyright (c) 2026 Lead Journal of Economy and Administration 2026-07-02 2026-07-02 4 3 109 120 10.56403/lejea.v4i3.454