The Influence Of Love Of Money, Machiavellianism, Turnover Intention, And Job Stress On Dysfunctional Behavior With Individual Morality As A Moderating Variable

Authors

  • Puspa Lely Ramadhania Higher school of economics Indonesia Surabaya
  • Lilis Ardini Higher School of Economics Indonesia Surabaya
  • Kurnia Higher School of Economics Indonesia Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56403/nejesh.v2i2.109

Keywords:

Love of Money, Machiavellianism, Turnover Intention, Job Stress, Dysfunctional Behavior

Abstract

An auditor is required to be able to present relevant, accurate and timely information. When acting in the public interest, public accountants must comply with and apply all the basic principles and rules of professional ethics that apply. However, the facts show that there are still many accountants who work without being based on a professional code of ethics. The following research aims to determine the effect of love of money, Machiavellianism, turnover intention, and work stress on dysfunctional behavior with individual morality as a moderating variable. The research approach used in this study uses a quantitative research approach. The results of this study indicate that love of money has an effect on dysfunctional behavior, Machiavellianism has an effect on dysfunctional behavior, turnover intention has an effect on dysfunctional behavior, work stress has an effect on dysfunctional behavior, individual morality moderates love of money on dysfunctional behavior, individual morality does not moderate Machiavellianism on dysfunctional behavior, individual morality moderates turnover intention towards dysfunctional behavior, individual morality moderates work stress towards dysfunctional behavior.

References

Afsari, Erlynda Dian. (2018). Pengaruh Sifat Machiavellian, Tipe Kepribadian dan Stres Kerja Tehadap Perilaku Disfungsional (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Inspektorat di Magelang, Temanggung, dan Purworejo). Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang.

Adinda, Y., & Ikhsan, S. (2015). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Terjadinya Kecurangan (Fraud) Di Sektor Pemerintahan Kabupaten Klaten. Accounting Analysis Journal, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v4i3.8311

Aries, Ivan, & Imam Ghozali. (2006). Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro

Agus, Dharma. (2013). Manajemen Supervisi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ambari, I. P., & Wayan Ramantha, I. W. (2017). Pertimbangan Pasar Kerja, Pengakuan Profesional, Nilai-Nilai Sosial, Lingkungan Kerja, Personalitas Pemilihan Karir Sebagai Akuntan Publik. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 18 (1). https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/2 5571/16975

Allen, Alexander Jean. (2004). Strategi Membangun Tim Tangguh. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Briggs, A. R. J., & Coleman, M. (2007). Research Methods in Educa Tional Leadership and Management (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cinantya, I. G., & Merkusiwati, N. K. (2015). Pengaruh Corporate, Governance, Financial Indicators, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Pada Financial Distress.

Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism [Press release]

Davidson, G.C. (2010). Psikologi Abnormal. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Permai.

DY Nariasih, T Kurrohman, & A Andriana. (2017). Deteksi Kecurangan (Fraud) di Sektor Pemerintah. E-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 4 (1).

Emeka Mbah, Samuel & C.O. Ikemefuna. (2012). Job Satisfaction and Employees’ Turnover Intentions in Total Nigeria In Lagos State. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.

Ferawati, Dwi. (2016). Faktor- Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Non-Performing Financing Pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia Tahun 2012-2015. Skripsi.

Fishbein, M, & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to. Theory and Research, Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

Fitriani, Sarah, Istiqomah.P.P, & Rahmawati Hanny Y. (2017). Studi Empiris Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Perilaku Disfungsional Audit, Jurnal Akutansi, 21 (2).

Febriana, Varadita. (2012). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Peergantian Kantor Akuntan Publik di Perusahaan Go Publik yang Terdaftar di BEI. Skripsi.

Gosh & Crain. (1996). Experimental Investigation of Ethical Standart and Perceived Probability on International Noncompliance. Behavior Research in Accounting, 8.

Ghozali, Imam. (2009). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Harnoto. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: PT Prehallindo.

Hidayat, & Handayani. (2010). Peran Faktor-Faktor Individual dan Pertimbangan Etis Terhadap Perilaku Auditor Dalam Situasi Konflik Audit Pada Lingkungan Inspektorat Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Mitra Ekonomi dan Manajemen Bisnis, 1 (1).

Indriantoro, Nur & Bambang Supomo. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk. Akuntansi & Manajemen. Edisi 1. Cetakan ke-12. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Kreitner, Kinicki. (2010). Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization. in D. Goslin (Ed), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

Luthans, Fred. (2009). Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Sepuluh. Yogyakarta: Andy Offset.

Maghfiroh, Nur, Komala Ardiyani, & Syafnita. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Financial Stability, Personal Financial Need, External Pressure, Dan Ineffective Monitoring Pada Financial Statement Fraud Dalam Perspektif Fraud. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 16 (1).

Mulyadi & Kanaka Puradiredja. (1998). Auditing, Edisi Kelima, Buku Satu. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Mondy, R Wayne. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Purnamasari, St. Vena. (2006). Sifat Machiavellian dan Pertimbangan Etis: Antesedensi dan Perilaku Etis Auditor. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX Kota Padang.

Pujaningrum & A. Sabeni. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Penerimaan Auditor Atas Penyimpangan Perilaku Dalam Audit (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Semarang). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1 (1).

Purnomo, Ratno & Sri Lestari. (2010). Pengaruh Kepribadian, Self-Efficacy, dan. Locus of Control Terhadap Persepsi Kinerja Usaha Skala Kecil dan Menengah.

Rustiarini, Ni W. (2013). Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas, Tekanan Waktu, dan Sifat Kepribadian pada Kinerja. Jurnal Makara Hubs-Asia, 17 (2).

Richmond, K. A. (2001). Ethical Reasoning, Machiavellian Behavior, and Gender: The Impact on Accounting Students. Ethical Decision making Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia.

Radhiah, Tia, et al. (2016). Pengaruh Efektifitas Pengendalian Internal, Kesesuaian Kompensasi, dan Moralitas Individu terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi (Studi Kasus pada PT. Pos Indonesia Kcu Kota Pekanbaru). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 3 (1).

Robert L. Dipboye. (2018). The Emerald Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Michigan: Praeger.

Silaban, E. Bernard. (2012). Pengaruh Konflik Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan.

Saputra, Adi Kurniawan, Komang, dkk. (2019). Praktek Akuntabilitas dan Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Jurnal KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 10 (2).

Simmons, R., (2008). Questionnaires. London: Sage Publications Limited.

Sukwandi, R., & Meliana, M. (2014). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja dan Turn Over Intention Karyawan Usaha Kecil Menengah. Jurnal Rekayasa.

Samad, S. (2006). The Contribution of Demographic Variables Job Characteristics and Job Satisfaction on Turnover Intentions.

Santoni, A., & Harahap, M. N. (2018). International Review of Management and Marketing The Model of Turnover Intentions of Employees. International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(6), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.7284

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Syafitri, R. (2017). Meningkatkan Tanggung Jawab Belajar Melalui Strategi Giving Questions and Getting Answers Pada Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v1i2.12623.

Sigit Hermawan, Amirullah. (2016). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Malang: Media Nusa Creative.

Tang, T. (1992). The Meaning of Money Revisited. Journal of Organization Behavior, 13.

Tang, T., & Chiu, R. (2003). Income, Money Ethics, Pay Satisfaction, Commitment, And Unethical Behavior: Is The Love Of Money The Root Of Evil For Hong Kong Employees?. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 13-30.

Tang, T.L.P., Tang, D.S.H., & Luna-Arocas,R. (2005), Money Profiles: The Love Of Money, Attitudes and Needs. Journal of Business and Ethic, 34.

Tang, T. L. P., & B. Y. Homaifar. (2006). Income, the Love of Money, Pay Comparison, and Pay Satisfaction: Race and Gender as Moderators. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5).

Tang, T.L.P & Chen,Y.J. (2008). Intelligence Vs. Wisdom: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, and Unethical Behavior across College Major and Gender. Journal Business Ethic, 82.

Tarigan, H. G. (2013). Berbicara Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Wibowo, dkk. (2015). Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Sekolah. (Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasi). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yusra, Muhammad & Chairi Utami. (2018). Pengaruh Love of Money dan Machiavellian Terhadap Persepsi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi: (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Prodi Akuntansi Universitas Malikussaleh). Jurnal Akutansi dan Keuangan, 6 (1).

https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-timur/d-3362446/hasil-audit-bpkp-kasus-korupsi-bawaslu-jatim-dipa

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Ramadhania, P. L., Ardini , L. ., & Kurnia. (2023). The Influence Of Love Of Money, Machiavellianism, Turnover Intention, And Job Stress On Dysfunctional Behavior With Individual Morality As A Moderating Variable. Neo Journal of Economy and Social Humanities, 2(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.56403/nejesh.v2i2.109