Exploring the Potential of Architectural Semiotic in Realizing the Smart City Concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56403/nejesh.v3i1.170Keywords:
archirectural semiotic, smart city, concept analysis, use of technology, sustainabilityAbstract
Smart City is an urban development paradigm that integrates information and communication technology to improve the quality of life of residents, efficient resource management and environmental sustainability. Architectural semiotic, as the embodiment of visual language in architecture, has an important role in creating a smart and sustainable environment. This research aims to explore the potential of architectural semiotic in realizing the Smart City concept. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The results of this research reveal that the potential of architectural semiotic in the Smart City concept can be optimized through steps such as literature study and concept analysis, use of modern technology, interdisciplinary collaboration, community participation, and development of design guidelines. By engaging architects, data scientists, engineers, and the public, and creating practical guidance, this research details how architectural semiotic can be effectively integrated in smart city development. It is hoped that these results will make a significant contribution in creating a smart, efficient, aesthetic and sustainable urban environment in accordance with Smart City principles.
References
Allam, Z., & Dhunny, Z. A. (2019). On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities, 89, 80-91.
Anthopoulos, L. (2015, August). Defining smart city architecture for sustainability. In Proceedings of 14th electronic government and 7th electronic participation conference (IFIP2015) (pp. 140-147).
Bawany, N. Z., & Shamsi, J. A. (2015). Smart city architecture: Vision and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6(11).
Belli, L., Cilfone, A., Davoli, L., Ferrari, G., Adorni, P., Di Nocera, F., ... & Bertolotti, E. (2020). IoT-enabled smart sustainable cities: Challenges and approaches. Smart Cities, 3(3), 1039-1071.
Cohen, S., & Karatzimas, S. (2022). Analyzing smart cities' reporting: do they report “smart”?. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(5), 602-621.
Dameri, R. P. (2017). Smart city implementation. Progress in IS; Springer: Genoa, Italy.
Friedmann, J. (2000). The good city: In defense of utopian thinking. International journal of urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 460-472.
Gaur, A., Scotney, B., Parr, G., & McClean, S. (2015). Smart city architecture and its applications based on IoT. Procedia computer science, 52, 1089-1094.
Goodspeed, R. (2015). Smart cities: moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 79-92.
Gunawan, I. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: teori dan praktik. Bumi Aksara.
Ibrahim, M. A. A., & Morsy, D. M. (2016). Smart cities and sustainability: a set of vertical solutions for managing resources. International Journal of Environment and Sustainability, 5(3).
Ichimura, M. (2003, January). Urbanization, urban environment and land use: challenges and opportunities. In Asia-Pacific Forum for Environment and Development, Expert Meeting (Vol. 23, pp. 1-14).
Kirimtat, A., Krejcar, O., Kertesz, A., & Tasgetiren, M. F. (2020). Future trends and current state of smart city concepts: A survey. IEEE access, 8, 86448-86467.
Krampen, M. (1989). Semiotics in architecture and industrial/product design. Design Issues, 5(2), 124-140.
Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., Gupta, M. P., & Madaan, J. (2020). Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework. Technological forecasting and social change, 153, 119281.
Loeckx, A., & Heynen, H. (2020). Meaning and Effect: Revisiting Semiotics in Architecture. The Figure of Knowledge. Conditioning Architectural Theory, 1960s–1990s, 31-61.
Novotný, R., Kuchta, R., & Kadlec, J. (2014). Smart city concept, applications and services. J. Telecommun. Syst. Manag, 3(1), 2167-0919.
Pettit, C., Bakelmun, A., Lieske, S. N., Glackin, S., Thomson, G., Shearer, H., ... & Newman, P. (2018). Planning support systems for smart cities. City, culture and society, 12, 13-24.
Soendari, T. (2012). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif. Bandung, UPI. Stuss, Magdalena & Herdan, Agnieszka, 17
Somov, G. Y. (2001). Semiotics of architecture and architecture of semiotics. Semiotiche Berichte, 1-4.
Suprapti, A., & Iskandar, I. (2020). Reading meaning of architectural work in a living heritage. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 402, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.
Wenge, R., Zhang, X., Dave, C., Chao, L., & Hao, S. (2014). Smart city architecture: A technology guide for implementation and design challenges. China Communications, 11(3), 56-69.
Zhang, D. Q., Tan, S. K., & Gersberg, R. M. (2010). Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges. Journal of environmental management, 91(8), 1623-1633.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ayub Muktiono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
