PULICATION ETHICS

Publication Ethics:
Lead Journal of Economy and Administration (LEJEA) with Electronic ISSN 2828-6480 is a peer-reviewed journal, published by International Publisher - INDONESIAN SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION (YAPENBI) as an international journal that aims to develop economic and administration by disseminating research results in various fields of economics and administration. It is available online. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including the authors, editor-in-chief, Editorial Board, reviewers, and publishers.

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication:
The publication of an article in economics and social humanities is an important building block in the development of knowledge networks and their wide dissemination. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. The peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on standards of ethical behavior that are expected for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public. As an economics and administration publisher, Publisher takes its trusteeship duties seriously at all stages of publishing and recognizes ethical and other responsibilities. and We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Guidance on the ethics of economic and social humanities publications is based on and guided by Cope's core practice.

Publication decision:
Economics and administration editors are responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal will be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the discretion of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may consult other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Aspects of Justice:

Editors evaluate manuscripts at all times for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality:

Editors and any editorial staff may not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the appropriate author, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors and publishers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest:

Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

- Reviewer's Task

Contribution to Editorial Decisions:

Peer reviews assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Speed:

Any shortlisted Article who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that a rapid review is not possible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Confidentiality:

Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.

Objectivity Standard:

The review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not allowed. Editors must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment:

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. The reviewer should also call the editor's attention any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which he has personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a significant conflict of interest